Planned Casino’s Impact on Flood Protection

The Dispute

The Cologne District Government refuted accusations by the BUND regarding the Merkur Casino’s impact on flood protection in Siegburg. While the BUND raised concerns about jeopardizing flood protection, the government sees it as an ecological improvement. The BUND filed a lawsuit against the planned casino, alleging risks to the Sieg River’s flood protection.

Government’s Perspective

The District Government dismissed BUND’s claims, stating that the lawsuit hinders ecological improvements crucial for flood protection. They believe that the renovation plans for the Sieg River, including a 500-meter renaturation project, will enhance flood protection and reduce flood events. Expert agencies have confirmed these benefits in the approval process.

BUND’s Lawsuit Delays Construction

The District Government anticipates delays in constructing the Merkur Casino due to the BUND’s lawsuit filed in early January. Despite this legal hurdle, construction has commenced, with excavation work already underway. The excavation from the Sieg River will be integrated into the construction process, generating substantial material for the river’s renaturation.

Understanding the BUND

Who They Are

The BUND, or the Friends of the Earth Norway, champions environmental protection and preservation. Founded in 1975, with over 674,000 supporters, the organization focuses on ecological farming, climate protection, renewable energy, and biodiversity conservation. In the Siegburg casino case, the BUND highlights environmental risks, particularly in flood protection and river ecology.

Construction Considerations

During casino construction, stringent guidelines for soil protection mandate the use of gravel exclusively from the Sieg River. Purchasing gravel externally is prohibited. The Merkur Group aims to inaugurate the Siegburg casino in autumn 2025, pending submission of the building application to the city administration.