BGH Delays Judgment in Tipico Case

The long-standing dispute between sports betting provider Tipico and a player who lost 3,700 euros between 2013 and 2018 has hit a snag. The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has postponed its decision and referred the case to the European Court of Justice (EuGH).

BGH Seeks Clarity from EuGH

The BGH was unable to reach a definitive verdict due to unresolved EU law questions. They have asked the EuGH to clarify whether EU-based sports betting providers can offer services in other EU countries without specific licenses.

EuGH Ruling from 2016 Supports Providers

In 2016, the EuGH ruled against criminal actions towards non-licensed operators who sought authorization. Many gambling providers rely on EU laws for service provision, even without national licenses. In the current Tipico case, the lack of license could affect contract validity, pending EuGH ruling.

Tipico Optimistic, DSWV Supports EuGH Referral

Tipico’s lawyer and the German Sports Betting Association are confident in a favorable EuGH decision. Tipico aimed for EuGH clarification, while the player’s claim is now held by Gamesright. The outcome remains uncertain, possibly leading to case-by-case assessments in the future.